Is the IGP showing selective attention to threats based on political alignment?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Inspector-General of Police Has Been Questioned on Perceived Selective Attention to Threats

Concerns have been raised regarding the Inspector-General of Police's (IGP) response to threats made against a radio presenter, with a prominent politician suggesting a pattern of "selective attention." This perception stems from the IGP's typically swift engagement on social media regarding matters involving opposition figures, contrasted with his silence on recent threats directed at a radio presenter who critiqued hudud law. The presenter, Aisyah Tajuddin, faced death and rape threats after a video she featured, which discussed issues in Kelantan alongside hudud implementation, was widely circulated.
Silence on Threats Against Radio Presenter

Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar, the Inspector-General of Police, has remained silent on Twitter concerning the death and rape threats allegedly received by radio presenter Aisyah Tajuddin. These threats emerged after a video critical of hudud, which highlighted existing problems in Kelantan, was uploaded. The politician questioning the IGP's silence pointed out that these threats had been public for approximately 36 hours, suggesting the IGP could not claim ignorance of the situation.
Contrasting Social Media Engagement

The DAP adviser noted a marked difference in the IGP's typical online behaviour, observing that he usually responds rapidly on Twitter to matters involving investigations against Pakatan Rakyat (PR) lawmakers and activists. This perceived swiftness in addressing issues pertinent to the opposition is contrasted with the current lack of public comment or action announced regarding the threats against Aisyah Tajuddin, leading to questions about the IGP's priorities.
Context of the Controversial Video

Aisyah Tajuddin received the threats after a video titled "Hudud Isi Periuk Nasi?" (Does hudud fill our rice bowls?) was published on the business radio station BFM's website and YouTube channel. In the video, she discussed ongoing challenges in Kelantan, such as flood victims, drug issues, and divorce rates, in the context of the state's push for hudud law. Following the video's release, BFM subsequently removed the content and issued an apology for any offence caused.
Broader Concerns on Freedom of Expression

The father of Aisyah Tajuddin, Professor Dr Mohamad Tajuddin Mohamad Rasdi, publicly expressed his concerns about the safety of expressing dissenting views in Malaysia. He questioned whether the country remained a safe place if merely voicing an opposing opinion could attract such severe dangers as rape and death threats. The politician suggested that as the nation's top police official, the IGP would be the most appropriate figure to address these profound concerns about freedom of expression and safety.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Is the IGP showing selective attention to threats based on political alignment?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends