Is the PPPA 1984 outdated or still necessary for press regulation?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 Remains Necessary for Media Regulation, According to Veteran Journalist Datuk Ahmad Rejal Arbee

Veteran journalist Datuk Ahmad Rejal Arbee asserts that the Printing Presses and Publications Act (PPPA) 1984 is still essential for regulating Malaysia's media landscape. He argues that the Act is necessary to maintain order within the press and to prevent the exacerbation of racial tensions, given the prevailing sensitivities among the nation's diverse communities. Ahmad Rejal views absolute media freedom as unattainable and posits that the PPPA serves as the most effective framework for governing the press industry.
Justification for Continued Regulation

Ahmad Rejal contends that the PPPA is crucial for preventing irresponsible reporting, particularly concerning articles that touch upon racial issues. He cited instances where media outlets have published articles with racial undertones, which he believes justifies the continued existence and application of the Act. His perspective is that while responsible journalism exists, there are individuals within the media who act irresponsibly, potentially damaging inter-racial relations and societal harmony.
Media Freedom Within Legal Boundaries

Dismissing claims that the PPPA stifles media freedom, Ahmad Rejal stated that media organisations can still operate effectively within the existing legal framework. He acknowledged past incidents, such as the suspension of publications, but maintained that these actions do not preclude journalists from fulfilling their professional duties. The Act, in his view, provides the necessary guardrails to ensure that reporting does not cross into harmful territory, particularly regarding sensitive ethnic relations in Malaysia.
Historical Context of Suspensions

The necessity of the PPPA is underscored by past actions taken under its provisions. In July of the current year, two publications belonging to The Edge Media Group faced suspension due to their coverage of 1 Malaysia Development Berhad. Although these suspensions were later overturned by the courts, which deemed the Home Ministry's actions irrational and unlawful, the initial action highlights the enforcement powers vested in the Act. Similarly, in 2013, the news weekly The Heat had its publication suspended over a report concerning Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's alleged spending, though this suspension was eventually lifted.
Amendments and Enduring Powers

While amendments have been made to the PPPA, such as the removal of the annual permit renewal requirement for print media last year, the core power of the home minister to suspend publications remains intact. This enduring provision reflects a continued emphasis on regulatory oversight within the Malaysian press industry. The Act, therefore, continues to serve as a mechanism for managing media operations, balancing the pursuit of information with the imperative to maintain social order and racial harmony.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Is the PPPA 1984 outdated or still necessary for press regulation?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends