Ismail Sabri’s boycott call racist or justified against profiteering?

Question

Accepted Answer

Minister's Call for Boycott: Racist or Justified Against Profiteering?

Agriculture and Agro-Based Industries Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob's call for a boycott of Chinese vendors, which he linked to alleged profiteering, has drawn sharp criticism and defence. Isma president Abdullah Zaik Abd Rahman supported the minister's stance, arguing it was not racist but a necessary measure for the Malay majority to counter the alleged unfair monopoly held by minority groups in trade and business. Teo Kok Seong, a DAP lawmaker, however, denounced the call as racist and an insult to the public's intelligence.
Defence of the Boycott Call

Isma president Abdullah Zaik Abd Rahman defended Ismail Sabri's remarks, stating that the minister was merely advocating for the Malay majority to exert influence in the economic sphere. Zaik suggested that the boycott was a legitimate tactic for Malays to gain leverage in a business environment he claimed is dominated by minority communities. He further proposed that the federal government should actively develop Malay and Bumiputera businesses to foster greater competition.
Accusations of Racism and Distraction

DAP Youth chief Teo Kok Seong branded Ismail Sabri a "racist" for his boycott suggestion, asserting that such statements were inappropriate for a federal minister and served to distract from the impending implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in April. Teo argued that the focus should be on economic realities rather than divisive calls.
Clarification on Target and Motive

Following public outcry, Ismail Sabri clarified that his boycott call was not aimed at the entire Chinese community but specifically at "recalcitrant" Chinese traders who, he claimed, refused to lower prices despite a decrease in fuel costs. He posited that this refusal to adjust prices, in conjunction with reduced fuel expenses, constituted a form of economic sabotage intended to undermine public confidence in the government, which was being unfairly blamed for the rising cost of living. The minister did not provide further details on how he determined that Chinese businesses were exclusively responsible for maintaining steady prices without justification.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Ismail Sabri’s boycott call racist or justified against profiteering?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends