Should Dewan Rakyat Speaker have investigated Pandora Papers first?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Dewan Rakyat Speaker Should Have Awaited an Official Inquiry Before Concluding on the Pandora Papers

Klang MP Charles Santiago has stated that Dewan Rakyat Speaker Datuk Azhar Azizan Harun should have refrained from making definitive statements about the Pandora Papers until an official inquiry was conducted. Santiago was responding to Azhar's assertion that the Pandora Papers primarily reveal share ownership in offshore accounts rather than evidence of billions of ringgit being lost illicitly. The Klang MP questioned the basis for the Speaker's conclusion in the absence of a thorough investigation or a Royal Commission of Inquiry.
Speaker's Stance on Pandora Papers Under Scrutiny

Datuk Azhar Azizan Harun's recent remarks regarding the Pandora Papers have drawn criticism from Klang MP Charles Santiago. Azhar reportedly stated that the exposé, which involves approximately 11.9 million documents, does not demonstrate the loss of billions of ringgit to offshore accounts but rather identifies owners of shares within such accounts. Santiago found this conclusion "baffling," questioning whether the Speaker had consulted a crystal ball and emphasizing that such pronouncements should ideally follow a formal investigation or a Royal Commission of Inquiry.
Parliamentary Debate and Opposition Concerns

The Pandora Papers have become a point of contention within Parliament, as evidenced by a recent exchange between Speaker Azhar and Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Azhar rejected a motion to debate the contents of the Pandora Papers, citing that it was submitted under the incorrect Standing Order. During this exchange, Anwar Ibrahim questioned the Speaker's apparent defense of potentially corrupt individuals and argued that those implicated should be given an opportunity to present their explanations.
The Nature of Offshore Accounts and Financial Secrecy

Charles Santiago highlighted the inherent difficulties in tracing the true ownership of offshore assets, explaining that shell companies, often established in jurisdictions with high levels of financial secrecy, can be used to obscure the identities of beneficial owners. While acknowledging that possessing an offshore account is not inherently illegal, Santiago stressed that using such structures to evade taxes or conceal assets constitutes fraudulent activity. He argued that without independent investigations, it remains challenging to ascertain the activities of prominent Malaysians named in the leaked documents.
Calls for Investigation into Named Individuals

Following the release of the Pandora Papers by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists on October 3, Charles Santiago has called for a formal investigation into the source of funds for several individuals named in the exposé. These individuals allegedly own offshore accounts and properties, and the list includes current Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz, as well as former ministers Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Tun Daim Zainuddin. Santiago asserted that a thorough probe is necessary to understand the financial dealings of these prominent figures.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Should Dewan Rakyat Speaker have investigated Pandora Papers first?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends