Should MACC reveal names of those under graft probe?

Question

Accepted Answer

MACC Should Not Publicly Disclose Names of Graft Probe Individuals, Says Sarawak Leader

A prominent leader from Sarawak's ruling party has asserted that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) should refrain from issuing public statements or naming individuals under investigation for graft. Datuk Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah, a Parti Pesaka Bumiputra Bersatu (PBB) supreme council member, argued that such disclosures create undue anxiety and lead to premature judgment by the public before any charges are formally laid in court. He suggested that the commission should maintain the confidentiality of its investigations and only proceed with charges when sufficient evidence has been gathered.
Calls for Confidentiality in Investigations

Abdul Karim, who also serves as the Assistant Minister of Housing, expressed his view that MACC's practice of announcing the identities of those under investigation causes unnecessary distress, particularly among government officers. He emphasized that the commission's focus should be on building a solid case, and if evidence warrants prosecution, individuals should be charged in court. This stance suggests a preference for a more discreet investigative process, avoiding public pronouncements that could potentially tarnish reputations before a legal determination is made.
Ongoing "Ops Gergaji" and Its Scope

The MACC has initiated "Ops Gergaji," an operation targeting alleged abuse of power and corruption within Sarawak, which commenced on May 12. This operation has already identified an assistant minister and a state lawmaker as individuals being investigated. The commission has also taken the step of recording statements from ten individuals, including senior figures from government departments and state agencies, to aid its ongoing inquiries.
Financial Implications of the Probe

As part of "Ops Gergaji," the MACC has taken significant action by freezing approximately RM700 million. This substantial sum is held within the bank accounts of various timber companies and individuals connected to the ongoing investigations. The freezing of these assets indicates the scale and seriousness of the financial aspects being examined in relation to the alleged corrupt practices.
Legal Framework for Investigations

The investigations are being conducted under specific legal provisions, primarily Sections 17(a) and 17(b) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009. Additionally, Section 4(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 is being applied. These legal frameworks provide the MACC with the authority to conduct its inquiries and take measures such as freezing assets.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Should MACC reveal names of those under graft probe?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends