Should Perak proceed with rare earths mining despite past environmental issues?

Question

Accepted Answer

Perak's Rare Earths Mining Exploration Faces Scrutiny Amidst Past Environmental Concerns

Perak's move to explore rare earths mining through a memorandum of understanding with a Chinese firm has drawn significant criticism, primarily due to the historical environmental and health consequences of similar ventures. Concerns have been raised that the potential economic benefits do not outweigh the risks of radioactive contamination, echoing the disastrous Bukit Merah rare earths project of the 1990s. While proponents argue that the current agreement is merely for feasibility studies and that modern techniques may differ from past operations, environmental groups and political factions remain wary of the long-term implications for residents and the environment.
Historical Precedent of Radioactive Poisoning

The exploration of rare earths mining in Perak has been met with strong opposition, largely fuelled by the memory of the Bukit Merah incident. In the 1990s, the Asian Rare Earth (ARE) plant, a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Chemicals, was responsible for significant radioactive poisoning in the Bukit Merah area. This past disaster serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers associated with rare earths extraction and processing, leading to persistent fears among the local population and environmental advocates.
Environmental Groups Warn of Enduring Radiation Risks

Environmental organisations, such as Friends of the Malaysian Environment (SAM), have voiced strong objections to the memorandum of understanding signed with China's Chinalco GXNF Rare Earth Development. SAM president Meenakshi Raman highlighted that rare earth mining activities pose a substantial risk to the welfare of residents. She cautioned that the potential radiation risks could persist for billions of years, rendering affected areas permanently unsafe for human habitation and raising concerns about the long-term environmental legacy of such projects.
Economic Potential Versus Environmental and Public Trust

Despite the acknowledged risks and historical context, Perak Mentri Besar Incorporated (MBI) CEO Anuar Zainal Abidin has defended the exploration, citing the potentially lucrative nature of rare earths mining. He argued that the agreement is solely for studying the viability of such operations and should not be halted due to past incidents. However, Perak PKR chief Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak countered that public sentiment is already strained, referencing ongoing dissatisfaction with the continued operation of the Lynas rare earth plant in Gebeng, Kuantan, and urging the state government to prioritise safer economic alternatives that do not erode public trust.
Nature of the Agreement Under Scrutiny

The exact nature and scope of the memorandum of understanding with the Chinese firm are central to the ongoing debate. While Anuar Zainal Abidin has described the agreement as a preliminary study into the feasibility of rare earths mining, critics remain unconvinced. The lack of detailed information regarding the specific terms, conditions, and proposed safety protocols for any future operations fuels apprehension, particularly given the critical role rare earths play in advanced technologies like smartphones and hybrid car batteries, making their extraction a subject of intense global interest.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Should Perak proceed with rare earths mining despite past environmental issues?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends