Should referendums be used for controversial national issues?

Question

Accepted Answer

Referendums Proposed as a Mechanism for Resolving Controversial National Issues

A former Johor DAP leader, Dr Boo Cheng Hau, has proposed that the Malaysian government consider using referendums to address controversial national issues. This suggestion emerged in the context of the government's decision not to ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), a move that followed significant public debate and demonstrations. Dr Boo believes that a constitutional provision is necessary to empower the general electorate with the democratic right to vote on critical matters affecting the country's future, such as international treaties and reforms.
Proposal for Constitutional Provision for Referendums

Dr Boo articulated that the establishment of a constitutional provision would formalise the use of referendums for significant national decisions. He suggested that allowing citizens to vote on the ratification of ICERD, for instance, would exemplify a "New Malaysia" that embraces novel approaches to resolving contentious issues. This democratic process, he argued, could foster transparency and public consensus on matters with far-reaching implications for the nation's trajectory.
ICERD Ratification as a Case Study

The debate surrounding ICERD served as a specific backdrop for Dr Boo's proposal. The convention commits signatories to ensuring equal treatment for all races. Critics of its ratification in Malaysia raised concerns that it could undermine the special position of Malays and existing quota provisions within public institutions, as outlined in Article 153 of the Federal Constitution. The Prime Minister's Office ultimately announced that the government would not proceed with ratification, acknowledging the intensity of public discourse and opposition.
Referendums as a Regional Leadership Model

Beyond domestic implications, Dr Boo suggested that Malaysia could set a precedent for regional leadership in managing ethnic relations. He contrasted Malaysia's potential approach with that of Myanmar, implying that a democratic decision-making process through referendums on issues like ICERD could position Malaysia as a model for resolving ethnic animosities within Asean. This approach, he posited, would showcase a commitment to democratic principles and inclusive governance.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Should referendums be used for controversial national issues?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends