Should Sarawak repair the historic Astana instead of building new?

Question

Accepted Answer

Sarawak Government Urged to Justify Spending on New Astana Over Historic Building

Bandar Kuching MP Dr Kelvin Yii has called on the Sarawak government to provide a clear rationale and justification for its decision to construct a new Astana Negeri, the official residence of the Sarawak governor, using millions in public funds. Dr Yii specifically questioned the overall project cost, the identity of the company awarded the contract, and whether the procurement process involved an open tender. He further suggested that repairing and upgrading the existing Astana building, which dates back to 1870 and holds significant historical value, would be a more prudent use of resources.
Rationale for New Astana Construction Questioned

The state government has announced plans to construct a new Astana Negeri, which will replace the current building constructed in 1870. The intention is to transform the existing Astana into a museum. However, Dr Yii has requested transparency regarding the government's reasoning behind this decision, particularly concerning the substantial expenditure of public funds. He emphasised that full transparency and a proper justification are essential for gaining public support for such a project.
Proposal to Repair and Retain Existing Astana

Dr Yii proposed that repairing and upgrading the existing Astana building, built in 1870 by Sir Charles Brooke, the Second White Rajah of Sarawak, would be a more cost-efficient and historically sensitive approach. He believes the current Astana carries significant historical weight and should be preserved as the official residence for the Head of State to safeguard its heritage. While not opposing the idea of turning the present Astana into a museum, Dr Yii noted that its value as a museum would primarily stem from its exhibits rather than the building itself.
Prioritisation of Public Funds

Dr Yii argued that if the state possesses surplus revenues, these funds should be prioritised for essential basic infrastructure and utilities across Sarawak. He expressed concern that excessive spending on a new Astana, even with available resources, could have long-term negative repercussions for the people of Sarawak. This perspective suggests a need for the government to demonstrate that the new Astana project is a more pressing necessity than addressing fundamental public needs.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Should Sarawak repair the historic Astana instead of building new?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends