Should the IGP be cited for contempt of court over custody rulings?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Inspector-General of Police Should Be Cited for Contempt of Court Over Custody Rulings

The Inspector-General of Police (IGP) has created a new "court" by deciding on a stay of execution in custody cases, effectively circumventing existing civil and syariah court rulings. This action is a dereliction of duty, as the IGP is sworn to uphold the law, specifically civil law, upon which his appointment is based. The article argues that the IGP must be cited for contempt of court for his failure to enforce existing legal orders.
The IGP's Decision to Not Take Sides and Create a New "Court"

The IGP instructed that children involved in custody disputes, where civil and syariah courts have issued differing rulings, be placed in a childcare centre while a solution is "worked out." This decision bypasses the established legal framework, with the article asserting that the IGP has effectively established a new "court" alongside the civil and syariah courts. This move is presented as an abdication of his responsibility to uphold the law.
The Ambiguity of Lawful Orders and the IGP's Duty

The article emphasizes that a policeman's role is to be the guardian and enforcer of the law in civil society. When an officer, particularly the IGP, fails to obey a legal order, they renege on their sworn duty. The M. Indira Gandhi and S. Deepa rulings are cited as examples where there is no ambiguity. If personal beliefs trouble the IGP, the article suggests the "moral thing to do" is to relinquish his post, as his appointment was based on civil law, which he is sworn to protect.
Historical Precedent and Executive Overreach

A parallel is drawn to a past case involving Tun Abdul Hamid Omar, who cited acting upon instructions from the King. The article suspects that the executive branch may be overextending itself to find a political solution, possibly due to inconvenience with the law or a perceived "incongruence." The government has urged involved parties to seek redress from the Federal Court and hinted at priority for these cases, but the article insists that the law must take its course as the basis of the Rule of Law.
The Importance of Upholding the Rule of Law

The article criticizes the lack of enforcement of existing laws, stating there are sufficient laws but insufficient will to enforce them. It argues that the government must uphold the Rule of Law strenuously, as this is the very foundation of a functioning society. The custody cases are clarified as not being about the "superiority" of courts, but about the defined jurisdictions of each. The "siege mentality" by champions of race and religion, which suggests observing civil law subordinates syariah law, is deemed malignant and invasive. The question is posed: law and order or anarchy?

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Should the IGP be cited for contempt of court over custody rulings?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends