Under Rule 63, who can read a judge’s absent judgement in court?

Question

Accepted Answer

Under Rule 63, an absent judge’s judgement can be read by another judge or the Registrar
Rule 63(2) of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995 provides that a judgement may be pronounced even if the judges who composed the Court, or any of them, are absent. In that situation, the judgement of any judge not present may be read by a judge of the Court or by the Registrar.
What Rule 63(2) allows when a judge is absent
Rule 63(2) states that the Court’s judgement may still be pronounced notwithstanding the absence of the judges who composed the Court or any of them. This means the pronouncement can proceed even when one of the panel members is not there.
Who is permitted to read the absent judge’s judgement
Rule 63(2) also specifies that the judgement of the absent judge may be read by a judge of the Court. The same provision also allows the judgement to be read by the Registrar.
How this fits with courtroom pronouncement practice
Rule 63(1) requires that the judgement of the Court be pronounced in open Court, either on the hearing of the appeal or at a later time. It also notes that the Registrar must give notice of any subsequent time to the parties to the appeal, even when the panel is not fully present.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Under Rule 63, who can read a judge’s absent judgement in court?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends