Was 22 months enough time for PH to govern effectively?

Question

Accepted Answer

Twenty-two months was insufficient for Pakatan Harapan to govern effectively.

Former PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar stated that the 22 months Pakatan Harapan (PH) was in power was too short a period to govern effectively, especially when contrasted with Barisan Nasional's (BN) six decades of administration. She indicated that this limited timeframe contributed to public dissatisfaction and the perception that PH failed to deliver on its promises. This sentiment, she believes, will impact PH's chances in future elections, suggesting a significant recovery period of at least a decade, or two general election cycles, will be necessary for the coalition to regain public trust and potentially win back federal power.
Public Trauma from 22 Months in Power

Nurul Izzah conveyed a "negative feeling" regarding the upcoming general election, attributing it to the lingering impact of the 22 months PH governed. She described this period as one from which people, including herself, are still "traumatised," suggesting that the experience was profoundly challenging or disappointing for the public. This emotional residue means PH faces an uphill battle to regain acceptance and confidence from voters.
Unfulfilled Manifesto Promises

A key reason cited for PH's anticipated electoral struggles is the persistent memory of unfulfilled promises from the 14th general election manifesto. Nurul Izzah specifically noted that promises such as the full realisation of affordable housing for the B40 group were not achieved during PH's tenure. This failure to deliver on core pledges continues to affect public perception and makes it difficult for PH to convince voters of its capability to govern effectively.
Comparison with Barisan Nasional's Governance

The brevity of PH's 22-month rule is highlighted when compared to Barisan Nasional's extensive six-decade period in power. This contrast underscores the argument that PH did not have sufficient time to implement its agenda and demonstrate its governance capacity. While BN also faced criticism regarding manifesto fulfillment, the sheer length of its rule provided a different context for public evaluation, whereas PH's short term meant its perceived shortcomings were amplified.
Challenges in Policy Implementation

Even within the limited 22 months, specific policy implementation challenges were evident. Nurul Izzah pointed to the RM1,500 minimum wage policy as an example, noting that exceptions for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) had not been finalised. This illustrates the practical difficulties in executing significant policy changes within a compressed timeframe, further complicating PH's ability to showcase effective governance.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Was 22 months enough time for PH to govern effectively?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends