Were the six-month jail terms consistent with the Animal Welfare Act charge?

Question

Accepted Answer

Six-Month Jail Terms for Poisoning Pigeons Aligned with Animal Welfare Act Charge

Two Indonesian men were sentenced to six months in jail for intentionally feeding poison to pigeons, a penalty framed under Section 31 (1) (a) of the Animal Welfare Act. This section of the Act outlines potential punishments for cruelty to animals, including a maximum fine of RM100,000 or imprisonment for up to two years, or both. The sentences handed down by the Sessions Court in Shah Alam reflect the severity with which such actions are treated under Malaysian animal welfare legislation.
Sentencing Under the Animal Welfare Act

The charge against Fathur Rosi Arsijo, 22, and Abdul Rahman Sauji, 32, specifically invoked Section 31 (1) (a) of the Animal Welfare Act. This provision addresses acts of cruelty towards animals. While the Act specifies a maximum penalty of RM100,000 fine or two years imprisonment, the six-month jail term imposed on the two men falls within the statutory limits for such an offense. The court's decision to impose a custodial sentence highlights the judiciary's stance on animal cruelty cases.
Details of the Offense and Investigation

The incident involved the intentional poisoning of pigeons, discovered by authorities on July 21, when a team from the Selangor Animal Welfare Office found pigeon carcasses and poisoned corn feed near a factory in Batu Tiga. Subsequent analysis of the feed and carcasses confirmed the presence of poison. The investigation led to the arrest of the two Indonesian men, who subsequently pleaded guilty to the charge.
Court Proceedings and Further Cases

The two men, identified as cleaners, were ordered to begin their six-month jail sentences from their arrest date of July 26. Concurrently, the court is managing the case of two other individuals, Noor Hazirah Masuan and Nurul Najwa Shafikah Zukri, who face the same joint charge but have pleaded not guilty. Their case management is scheduled for November 17, indicating ongoing legal proceedings related to the incident.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

Were the six-month jail terms consistent with the Animal Welfare Act charge?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends