What are the alleged structural shortcomings of the JAC Act?

Question

Accepted Answer

Alleged Structural Shortcomings of the JAC Act Not Specified in Legal Challenge Withdrawal

The specific structural shortcomings of the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009 (JAC Act) that formed the basis of a legal challenge were not detailed in the court documents, as the case was withdrawn. The lawyer who initiated the challenge, Datuk Syed Amir Syakib Arsalan Syed Ibrahim, had sought to invalidate the JAC and its governing Act, citing a desire to test the constitutionality of the legislation and raise awareness of its perceived flaws. However, the precise nature of these alleged shortcomings was not elaborated upon in the public statements regarding the case's discontinuation.

The legal action aimed to secure a court order for the Prime Minister to appoint judges strictly following the constitutional process, without the JAC's involvement. The lawyer's intention, as stated, was to foster public discussion on institutional safeguards that align with the Constitution. This legal pursuit included an application to refer 16 constitutional law questions to the Federal Court, all of which have now been dropped following the government's expressed willingness to consider reforms.

The decision to withdraw the case was influenced by recent statements from the Minister of Law and Institutional Reform, YB Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. She acknowledged that the JAC Act 2009 is amenable to improvement and indicated the government's readiness to engage with stakeholders on potential reforms to the judicial appointment framework. This commitment from the government led the lawyer to conclude that the constitutional challenge was no longer necessary at that juncture.

The lawyer had also expressed satisfaction that there was no immediate prejudice or uncertainty affecting the judiciary's leadership, referencing the recent completion of appointments for the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal in accordance with Article 122B of the Constitution. He urged the government to consider the questions raised regarding the judicial appointment process and potential constitutional amendments to ensure the JAC framework aligns with the country's constitutional structure and values.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What are the alleged structural shortcomings of the JAC Act?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends