What are the cost implications of holding state elections separately?

Question

Accepted Answer

Holding separate state elections would incur an additional cost of approximately RM2 billion to the Election Commission.

This cost implication arises if some states decline to dissolve their legislative assemblies concurrently with Parliament, necessitating independent state elections. Perikatan Nasional has recommended that Parliament be dissolved next year, after the flood season, to avoid this scenario and allow for the 15th General Election (GE15) to be held under more favourable conditions.
Additional Expenditure for Separate State Elections

The Election Commission would face an additional expenditure of around RM2 billion if state legislative assemblies are not dissolved simultaneously with Parliament. This financial burden would result from conducting separate elections for individual states, as opposed to a unified general election.
Perikatan Nasional's Stance on Election Timing

Perikatan Nasional, through its chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, has advocated for delaying GE15 until after the monsoon season, suggesting a dissolution of Parliament in April, May, or June of the following year. This recommendation is based on the significant impact of annual floods, which have recently worsened, causing substantial damage to property and loss of lives.
Constitutional Mandate and Practical Concerns

While the constitution mandates a general election every five years, the current term has not yet concluded, with several months remaining. Muhyiddin highlighted that the immediate concern is the flood situation, which cannot be disregarded due to its severe consequences. Holding elections during the peak flood season is seen as impractical and potentially disruptive.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What are the cost implications of holding state elections separately?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends