What are the arguments against abolishing the Sedition Act?

Question

Accepted Answer

Arguments Against Abolishing the Sedition Act 1948 Have Been Raised

The National Unity Memorandum Preparation Committee has urged the government not to abolish the Sedition Act 1948, citing concerns that such a move would be influenced by specific individuals. The committee has instead proposed the development of a more effective instrument for national security.
Appeal to Withhold Abolition

Datuk Ibrahim Ali, chairman of the National Unity Memorandum Preparation Committee, stated that the committee has appealed to the government against abolishing the Sedition Act 1948. This appeal was made in the context of broader discussions on national unity and security, with the committee suggesting that succumbing to calls for abolition might serve the interests of particular groups.
Proposal for Alternative Security Instrument

In lieu of abolishing the Sedition Act, the committee has put forth a proposal for the creation of a new mechanism. This proposed instrument is intended to be a truly effective tool for safeguarding national security. The committee is currently in the process of drafting this proposal, which will subsequently be presented to the National Unity Consultative Council for a convention.
Context of National Unity Dialogue

The appeal and proposal were articulated by Ibrahim Ali, who is also the president of Pertubuhan Pribumi Perkasa Malaysia (Perkasa), a Malay supremacy non-governmental organisation. His remarks followed a Public Dialogue and Fourth National Unity Issues event attended by approximately 200 representatives from 50 non-governmental organisations. This dialogue is part of a nationwide tour aimed at discussing national unity matters.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What are the arguments against abolishing the Sedition Act?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends