What are the reasons behind the absence of top Umno leaders?

Question

Accepted Answer

Reasons for Absence of Top Umno Leaders During Sosma Vote Remain Unexplained

The specific reasons behind the absence of top Umno leaders, including Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Datuk Seri Najib Razak, and Datuk Seri Ahmad Maslan, during the parliamentary vote on the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma) motion remain undisclosed. PKR communications chief Fahmi Fadzil has publicly questioned the absence of these 31 government Members of Parliament (MPs), highlighting that their presence could have ensured the motion's approval. The motion to extend the enforcement of sub-section 4(5) of Sosma for another five years was ultimately rejected in a bloc vote, with 86 MPs voting against, 84 in favour, and a significant 50 MPs absent.
Question Raised Over Absence of Key Government Figures

Fahmi Fadzil, who is also the Lembah Pantai MP, pointed out that several prominent Umno leaders, including Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi (Bagan Datuk), Datuk Seri Najib Razak (Pekan), and Datuk Seri Ahmad Maslan (Pontian), were among the 31 government MPs who did not attend the parliamentary session for the Sosma motion vote. He suggested that if even a few of these absent MPs had been present, the government's motion would have passed, underscoring the impact of their non-attendance on a critical legislative decision.
Impact of Absenteeism on Sosma Motion

The absence of these MPs proved consequential for the government's motion concerning Sosma. The proposed extension of sub-section 4(5) of the Act failed to gain approval due to the bloc vote outcome. The final tally revealed 86 votes against the motion and 84 in favour, with 50 MPs not participating in the vote, a scenario that Fahmi Fadzil argued could have been altered by the presence of the missing government representatives.
Calls for Explanation from Absent MPs

Fahmi Fadzil urged the absent MPs to provide justifications for their non-attendance, particularly in light of the motion's importance and the subsequent rejection. He contrasted their absence with the focus placed on Pakatan Harapan's role in a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), suggesting that the government's own MPs should be held accountable for failing to support a motion brought forward by their own government. The outcome has led to further political discourse regarding parliamentary attendance and party discipline.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What are the reasons behind the absence of top Umno leaders?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

9

0

0

Share with friends