What aspects of the Sedition Act should be retained?

Question

Accepted Answer

Certain provisions of the Sedition Act should be retained to protect the monarchy.

Bukit Gelugor MP Ramkarpal Singh has stated that while the Sedition Act is largely irrelevant in its original context, specific provisions designed to safeguard the royal institution should be preserved. This perspective acknowledges the Act's historical origins and its perceived obsolescence while highlighting a particular area of concern for continued legal protection.
Provisions safeguarding the monarchy

Ramkarpal Singh specifically indicated that certain aspects of the Sedition Act should remain in place, particularly those clauses that offer protection to the royal institution. This suggests a view that while the Act's broader purpose has diminished, its function in upholding respect for the monarchy is still considered necessary.
Obsolete original purpose

The Sedition Act was originally enacted in 1948 by the British colonial government with the primary objective of combating the communist threat. Ramkarpal Singh argued that as the threat of communism no longer exists, the legislation's original purpose has concluded, rendering it largely irrelevant in its current form.
Potential for repeal and parliamentary support

Singh expressed confidence that repealing the Sedition Act would not face significant obstacles in Parliament. He drew a parallel to the repeal of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), suggesting that a similar consensus would likely emerge in favour of abolishing the Act. Communications and Multimedia Minister Gobind Singh Deo also indicated that plans to repeal the Act are progressing, with a proposed moratorium to be discussed in Cabinet.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What aspects of the Sedition Act should be retained?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends