What bail amount did the prosecution seek, and on what basis?

Question

Accepted Answer

Prosecution Sought RM10,000 Bail for Traffic Policeman Accused of Bribery

The prosecution requested bail be set at RM10,000 for a traffic policeman accused of accepting a bribe, arguing that the alleged offence is non-bailable. This stance was presented in the Sessions Court during proceedings where the accused, Wan Shazrul Wan Shamsuddin, pleaded not guilty to the charge.
Bail Request and Justification

The prosecution, represented by MACC officer Ameera D’Aneez Mohd Shukari, informed the court that the charge against Wan Shazrul falls under Section 17(a) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009. This section pertains to soliciting or accepting bribes. The prosecution's position was that the offence is non-bailable, meaning it is not automatically granted bail. However, they proposed a RM10,000 bail amount if the court deemed it appropriate to grant bail.
Nature of the Alleged Offence

Wan Shazrul, an assistant traffic investigation officer, is accused of accepting RM1,000 from an individual. This alleged bribe was purportedly given as an inducement for him to hand over documents related to a road accident case he was investigating. The incident is reported to have occurred at a restaurant in Jalan Ismail, Mersing, at 4 pm on December 13, 2023.
Potential Penalties Under the Act

Conviction under Section 17(a) of the MACC Act 2009 carries significant penalties. The law stipulates a maximum prison sentence of 20 years. Additionally, offenders face a fine that is either five times the value of the bribe amount or RM10,000, whichever is higher. This underscores the seriousness with which such corruption-related offences are treated.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What bail amount did the prosecution seek, and on what basis?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends