What contradiction does ADOR highlight between Min’s livestream stance and records?

Question

Accepted Answer

ADOR Alleges Min Orchestrated NewJeans' Breakaway Using Livestream as Evidence

ADOR has presented new evidence, including an audio recording, suggesting that Min Hee-jin, the former CEO, masterminded NewJeans' efforts to separate from the company. This recording purportedly captures Min advising the parents of the group's members that a specific YouTube livestream should proceed, as it could later be used as grounds for terminating the group's exclusive contracts. This assertion directly contradicts Min's prior statements, where she claimed to have discouraged the livestream and maintained that the members acted autonomously.
Audio Recording Suggests Livestream as Legal Leverage

A key piece of evidence submitted by ADOR is an audio recording dated September 2, 2024. According to ADOR's claims to the court, this recording reveals Min discussing the impending YouTube livestream of NewJeans, which took place nine days later. ADOR alleges that Min instructed the members' parents that the livestream was essential, stating it "must go ahead" because it could serve as crucial evidence in a future legal manoeuvre aimed at terminating the group's exclusive contracts with the agency.
Livestream Coincided with Demands for Min's Reinstatement

The September 11 livestream in question saw all five members of NewJeans publicly demanding HYBE's reinstatement of Min Hee-jin as ADOR's CEO by September 25. The members argued that the management changes had adversely impacted the group's identity and creative direction. This occurred after HYBE had removed Min as ADOR CEO in August 2024, citing a policy to separate management and production functions amidst allegations of internal conflict over control of ADOR and NewJeans' trajectory.
Min's Alleged Role in Contract Termination Efforts

ADOR further alleges that Min continued to direct the group's activities even after a court injunction in March 2025 that restricted members from entertainment activities without agency approval. The agency claims Min was involved in preparations for the group's appearance at ComplexCon Hong Kong, including production, styling, and choreography. ADOR also presented evidence of a performance agreement for this event, citing a US$500,000 consulting fee allegedly intended for Min, while the members were to collectively receive US$350,000 for the performance.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What contradiction does ADOR highlight between Min’s livestream stance and records?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends