What criteria justify athlete requests under the Road To Gold programme?

Question

Accepted Answer

Criteria for Justifying Athlete Requests Under the Road To Gold Programme

Requests submitted by athletes under the Road To Gold (RTG) programme are subject to a rigorous justification process, as not all applications will be automatically approved. The programme is designed to supplement existing athletic facilities and resources, and any request must demonstrate a clear and direct link to improving an athlete's performance. The RTG committee will carefully study each submission before a decision is rendered.
Performance Enhancement as the Primary Justification

The core criterion for a justified request is its direct contribution to enhancing an athlete's performance. This means that any application must clearly articulate how the requested support will aid in the athlete's training, preparation, or competitive capabilities. For instance, a request for a training partner or specialized overseas training, such as that considered for badminton player Lee Zii Jia, would be evaluated based on its potential to directly improve his performance metrics.
Reasonableness and Direct Contribution to Performance

Beyond being performance-enhancing, requests must also be deemed reasonable. This implies that the support sought should be proportionate and directly applicable to the athlete's sporting needs. An example of an unreasonable request, as cited by Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh, would be an athlete asking for a larger house, as this does not directly relate to improving athletic performance. The RTG programme is specifically a top-up service, meaning it is not intended to cover an athlete's basic living expenses or private arrangements.
The Role of the RTG Committee

The decision-making process for RTG requests involves the RTG committee, which will thoroughly examine each submission. This committee is responsible for assessing the justification, reasonableness, and direct performance-enhancing potential of an athlete's request. Their study ensures that the programme's resources are allocated effectively to support athletes with genuine needs that align with the objective of achieving Olympic gold.
Distinction from Basic Needs and Private Arrangements

It is important to understand that the RTG programme operates as a supplementary service, not a provider of basic necessities. Athletes are expected to cover costs associated with their private arrangements and fundamental needs. The programme is intended to provide additional support that goes beyond standard provisions, focusing on specific resources that can make a tangible difference in an athlete's journey towards Olympic success.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What criteria justify athlete requests under the Road To Gold programme?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends