What defects did Najib claim in the Federal Court appeal hearing?

Question

Accepted Answer

Najib Alleged Serious Defects in Federal Court Appeal Hearing

Datuk Seri Najib Razak claimed that the Federal Court's appeal hearing for his SRC International Sdn Bhd conviction suffered from serious defects and was contrary to the principles of international justice. He is seeking to overturn the court's decision or have a retrial, asserting that the proceedings did not meet acceptable standards.
Allegations of Procedural Irregularities

Najib, through his legal team, has pointed to alleged serious defects in the way the Federal Court handled his appeal. These claims form the basis of his application for a review of the court's August 23 decision, which upheld his conviction and sentence. The specifics of these alleged defects, however, were not detailed in the provided information.
Contradiction with International Justice Principles

Furthermore, Najib contends that the Federal Court's appeal hearing was conducted in a manner that contravened the rules of international justice. This assertion suggests a belief that fundamental legal principles, often recognised globally, were not adhered to during the proceedings. This forms a key part of his argument for a review or a retrial.
Seeking Judicial and Royal Review

These claims of defects and contraventions of international justice are central to Najib's ongoing legal and political efforts. His application to the Federal Court is his final judicial attempt to set aside his conviction. Concurrently, he has also pursued a petition for a royal pardon and filed a petition with the United Nations Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, seeking release or a retrial.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What defects did Najib claim in the Federal Court appeal hearing?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends