What defence did Los Angeles County offer in the photo trial?

Question

Accepted Answer

Los Angeles County Argued Photos Never Became Public and Removal Efforts Were Diligent

Los Angeles County contended in the photo trial that the graphic images from the helicopter crash that killed Kobe Bryant and others were never publicly released. The county further asserted that officials had diligently worked to remove the photographs from all devices. This defence was presented during the civil trial concerning the emotional distress claims brought by Vanessa Bryant and Chris Chester.
Efforts Made to Remove Photos

The county maintained that its officials had been diligent in their efforts to ensure the photographs did not become public. This included actions taken to scrub the images from the devices of those who had inappropriately captured or shared them. The defence highlighted these measures as evidence of the county's commitment to containing the spread of the sensitive material.
Photos Allegedly Not Publicly Disseminated

A central point of Los Angeles County's defence was the assertion that the graphic photos had never actually become public. Despite evidence presented during the trial of deputies and firefighters taking and sharing the images, the county argued that these actions did not result in public dissemination. This formed a key part of their strategy to limit liability for the emotional damages claimed by the plaintiffs.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What defence did Los Angeles County offer in the photo trial?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends