What did Law Society lawyer Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull argue?

Question

Accepted Answer

Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull Argued for Consistent Disciplinary Action for Dishonesty Offenses

Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull, representing the Law Society, argued that Pritam Singh should face disciplinary consequences consistent with any other lawyer convicted of an offense involving dishonesty. Bull further contended that Singh's specific roles as a lawyer, Member of Parliament (MP), and Leader of the Opposition rendered the offenses particularly grave.
Conviction for Giving False Evidence Led to Sanctions

Pritam Singh, the chief of the Workers' Party, was struck off Singapore's roll of advocates and solicitors following disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Law Society of Singapore. This action was a direct consequence of his conviction for giving false evidence. The Court of Three Judges, Singapore's highest disciplinary body for lawyers, presided over the proceedings.
Dishonesty as a Key Element of the Offenses

Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, who led the panel, highlighted that dishonesty was a fundamental aspect of the two offenses for which Singh was found guilty. These convictions stemmed from the false answers Singh provided to a parliamentary Committee of Privileges that was investigating former WP MP Raeesah Khan's misrepresentations in Parliament.
Aggravating Factors Due to Public Office

Bull specifically pointed out that Singh's standing as a legal professional, a Member of Parliament, and the Leader of the Opposition significantly amplified the seriousness of his offenses. This position, it was argued, carried a greater expectation of integrity and truthfulness.
Acceptance of Consequences by Singh's Counsel

Senior Counsel Andre Maniam Rajah, representing Pritam Singh, indicated that his client acknowledged the outcomes of his criminal trial and appeal, as well as the ensuing repercussions. Rajah stated that Singh maintains respect for the independence and professionalism of Singapore's judicial system and intends to act with integrity in his future capacities. The judges noted that both the Law Society and Singh's legal team accepted that the circumstances did not qualify for an exemption from being struck off the lawyers' roll.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What did Law Society lawyer Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull argue?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends