What did Luxembourg biennale organisers do after the plagiarism allegation emerged?

Question

Accepted Answer

Luxembourg Biennale Organisers Consult Specialist Amid Plagiarism Allegation

Following an allegation of plagiarism concerning an artwork displayed at the Contemporary Art Biennale in Strassen, Luxembourg, the jury overseeing the event has engaged a specialist to review the claims. The biennale, which took place at the Cultural Centre Paul Barble in May of this year, saw the artwork in question receive the Prix d’Encouragement, an award designated for emerging artists. The decision to consult an expert indicates a formal step in addressing the accusation of intellectual property infringement.
Specialist Consultation Underway

The jury responsible for awarding prizes at the Contemporary Art Biennale has initiated a consultation with a "specialist" to examine the plagiarism allegation. This process is part of the established procedures when such disputes arise, aiming to provide an informed assessment of the artwork's originality in relation to the accuser's work. The biennale, held in Strassen, Luxembourg, is a platform for artists, and the integrity of its awards is paramount.
Context of the Award

The artwork at the centre of the controversy had secured the Prix d’Encouragement, an award specifically established to support and recognise emerging talent within the art community. This prize, awarded at the May event held at the Cultural Centre Paul Barble, carries a monetary value of €1,500. The allegation suggests that the work, which won this award for its creator, Jeff Dieschburg, may have been substantially derived from another artist's existing photograph.
Accusation Details

The plagiarism claim was brought forth by Singaporean photographer Zhang Jingna, who is based in the United States. She presented a side-by-side comparison of her photograph, taken for Harper’s Bazaar Vietnam in 2017, and Dieschburg's painting. Zhang stated that she was alerted to the potential infringement by individuals in Luxembourg who had seen the artwork at the biennale or online. While Dieschburg's lawyer claimed that hundreds of other artworks bore similarities to Zhang's photograph, Zhang's legal representative noted that she had previously pursued cases where her work was used without permission.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What did Luxembourg biennale organisers do after the plagiarism allegation emerged?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends