What did the RAHSIA briefing cover about Sulu descendants’ claims?

Question

Accepted Answer

The "RAHSIA" Briefing on Sulu Descendants' Claims Summarised Publicly Available Information

A closed-door briefing held on Thursday night concerning the claims of the Sulu Sultanate descendants, which was classified as "RAHSIA" (Confidential), primarily summarised timetables and background information regarding the claims. Attendees, including Members of Parliament (MPs), were required to wear "RAHSIA" stickers and surrender their mobile phones, only to find that the information presented was largely available in the public domain, leading to disappointment among participants.
Briefing Content Focused on Existing Information

The briefing, attended by several federal ministers and the Attorney General, presented information that had already been disseminated through the internet and media. Government officials summarised the timelines pertaining to the Sulu descendants' claims. This approach meant that no novel information or state secrets were disclosed during the session, contrary to some expectations.
Ministerial and Attorney General Input

The event commenced with an opening speech delivered by the Minister of Law. Following this, the Attorney General provided a report detailing the case. Despite the attendance of multiple ministers, including those from the Prime Minister's Department, Tourism, and Energy, the substantive reporting was confined to the Minister of Law and the Attorney General.
MPs Expressed Disappointment Over Lack of New Information

Following the approximately 90-minute briefing, several MPs voiced their dissatisfaction, characterising the session as a mere regurgitation of the origins of the Sulu descendants' claim. The core complaint was that the briefing did not offer any new insights or strategic government plans for countering the claim, which some MPs had anticipated.
Debate on Government Strategy Was Not Addressed

During the question-and-answer segment, it was noted that the topic of the government's specific plans or strategies to counter the claims did not arise. This lack of discussion on strategic defence further contributed to the perception that the briefing did not contain confidential or sensitive material, prompting calls for parliamentary debate on related issues, such as past decisions on payments and border security.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What did the RAHSIA briefing cover about Sulu descendants’ claims?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends