What did the court mean by proving citizenship at birth, not later status?

Question

Accepted Answer

Court Clarifies Citizenship Determination Based on Birth Status, Not Subsequent Recognition

The Court of Appeal has clarified that establishing Malaysian citizenship hinges on an individual's status at birth, rather than their later recognition or administrative dealings with any country. This principle was central to recent rulings that denied citizenship to individuals despite factors like past passports or MyKid numbers. The court emphasized that citizenship by operation of law is contingent solely on fulfilling the explicit requirements laid out in the Federal Constitution at the time of birth.
Birth Status as the Primary Determinant

The court's judgments underscored that the crucial question for citizenship is whether an individual was "not born" a citizen of any other country. This is distinct from whether they are presently recognised as a citizen by another state. For instance, in Haritharan Mugunthan's case, the court noted that while he claimed not to possess citizenship from any country, he had not affirmatively proven he was not born a citizen of any nation. The government's argument that Thai law grants nationality by birth to anyone born to a Thai father or mother was sufficient to raise doubt about Haritharan's claim of not being born a citizen of any country.
Illegitimacy and Parental Citizenship at Birth

In cases where parents were not married at the time of a child's birth, the court applied Section 17 of the Federal Constitution's Second Schedule's Part III. This section dictates that for an illegitimate child, parentage refers to the mother. Consequently, such children cannot rely on their Malaysian father's citizenship and instead are generally considered to take on their non-Malaysian mother's citizenship. This was the basis for denying citizenship to two sisters born to a Malaysian father and a Filipino mother, as they were deemed to have acquired their mother's citizenship.
Insufficiency of Post-Birth Documentation

The court found that documents such as past Malaysian passports, MyKid numbers, or even certificates from foreign embassies indicating no passport issuance, do not serve as proof of citizenship status at birth. In the case of the two sisters, certificates from the Philippines' embassy stating they had never applied for or been issued a passport were deemed insufficient. These documents did not establish that the sisters were not Filipino citizens at birth or that they did not acquire Filipino citizenship within one year after birth, thereby failing to meet the constitutional threshold.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What did the court mean by proving citizenship at birth, not later status?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends