What does PAS claim the settlement means for the RM90 million allegation?

Question

Accepted Answer

PAS Claims Settlement Does Not Admit Guilt on RM90 Million Allegation

PAS has asserted that its out-of-court settlement with Sarawak Report editor Clare Rewcastle-Brown concerning the allegation of receiving RM90 million from Umno does not constitute an admission of guilt. The party maintains that the agreement to cease legal action is not an acceptance of the issues or accusations raised in the defamation case.
No Admission of Guilt

According to PAS secretary-general Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan, the settlement reached between PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang and Rewcastle-Brown is not an admission of guilt. He clarified that the agreement to not pursue the legal action is in no way an acknowledgement of the matters and accusations presented in the case.
Support for Leadership Decision

Takiyuddin conveyed that PAS believes the decision to settle was made by Abdul Hadi after considering the interests of the party and its members comprehensively. The party expressed full support for the resolution achieved between its president and the Sarawak Report editor.
Background of the Legal Action

The defamation suit was initiated by Abdul Hadi in 2017 against Rewcastle-Brown. The legal action stemmed from a 2016 article published by Sarawak Report which alleged that numerous PAS leaders had received RM90 million to covertly support Umno and Barisan Nasional in the lead-up to the 14th general election.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What does PAS claim the settlement means for the RM90 million allegation?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends