What does the ad interim injunction specifically prohibit the plaintiffs from doing?

Question

Accepted Answer

Ad Interim Injunction Restricts Six Plaintiffs in DKU Affairs

An ad interim injunction has been granted, specifically prohibiting six plaintiffs from undertaking several key actions concerning the Dewan Keadilan dan Undang (DKU). These prohibitions are in place pending further court proceedings and aim to maintain the DKU's status quo. The plaintiffs are barred from convening or holding any DKU meetings, whether directly or through representatives. They are also restrained from suspending, removing, or interfering with the duties of Raja Norazli as the DKU secretary.
Prohibition on Holding DKU Meetings

The court order explicitly forbids the six plaintiffs from organising or conducting any DKU meetings. This includes any Special Sitting that may have been scheduled. The injunction applies whether the plaintiffs act in person or through any agents, nominees, or appointees, ensuring a comprehensive restriction on convening any DKU gatherings.
Restraint on Interfering with DKU Secretary's Duties

Furthermore, the plaintiffs are expressly restrained from taking any action that would interfere with Raja Norazli's responsibilities as the DKU secretary. This prohibition covers any attempts to suspend or remove him from his duties while the court case is ongoing, thereby safeguarding his position and functions.
Bar on Assuming Secretary's Powers and Functions

The injunction also bars the plaintiffs from establishing or empowering any committee, person, or body to take over the powers and functions typically held by the DKU secretary. This measure is designed to prevent any unauthorised assumption of the secretary's responsibilities by other entities.
Prevention of Decisions on DKU Administration

Additionally, the plaintiffs are prevented from making or implementing any decisions related to the administration, governance, and overall affairs of the DKU. This broad restriction aims to halt any unilateral actions that could impact the ongoing management and direction of the institution.
Maintenance of Status Quo

Finally, the order prevents the plaintiffs from taking any steps that would alter or interfere with the existing status quo of the DKU. This prohibition specifically applies to the state of affairs as they were immediately before May 21, ensuring that no changes are made that could prejudice the outcome of the court's final determination.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What does the ad interim injunction specifically prohibit the plaintiffs from doing?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends