What evidence did the government fail to provide on terrorism risks?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Government Failed to Provide Evidence of Terrorism Risks Linked to Specific Countries

The government did not provide evidence demonstrating that any individual from the seven countries targeted by the immigration order had committed a terrorist attack on US soil. This lack of evidence was a key factor in the US court of appeals in San Francisco's decision to uphold the block on President Trump's executive order. The court specifically noted that the government had not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of its appeal.
No Terrorism Attacks Cited from Targeted Nations

The appellate court panel explicitly stated that the government presented no evidence to support the claim that any alien from the countries listed in the executive order had carried out a terrorist attack within the United States. This finding underpinned the court's decision to maintain the suspension of the travel ban.
Court Found No Irreparable Injury from Block

In its ruling, the three-judge appellate panel determined that the government had not demonstrated that failing to enter a stay on the block would cause irreparable injury. This assessment further supported the continuation of the suspension of the immigration order.
Executive Order Targeted Seven Predominantly Muslim Countries

The executive order, issued in late January, aimed to deny entry to all refugees for 120 days and travelers from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen for 90 days. Syrian refugees were to be blocked indefinitely under the initial directive.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What evidence did the government fail to provide on terrorism risks?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

9

0

0

Share with friends