What exactly did Upsi mean by the June 15 poster not being approved?

Question

Accepted Answer

Upsi said the June 15 poster was never submitted for consideration or approval, but its explanation left key details unclear
Upsi publicly disassociated itself from the viral June 15 poster by stating it had never been submitted to the university management for consideration or approval. However, the university’s statement was not clear enough, and it did not spell out whether the disassociation was tied to the religious approach used on the poster or simply to the fact that the material was circulated without authorisation. This left open the precise meaning behind “not approved” in terms of Upsi’s internal process and its view of the poster’s content.
Upsi’s specific claim about the poster’s approval status
Upsi said the June 15 poster had never been submitted to its management for consideration or approval. In practical terms, that means the university portrayed the poster as unauthorised within its own decision-making chain, since it did not reach management for sign-off. The viral poster had carried the logos of the university’s Islamic centre, its student affairs and alumni department, and the Malaysia Madani emblem.
The missing clarity in how Upsi framed “not approved”
While Upsi disassociated itself, the explanation did not clearly state what the university was objecting to beyond the lack of submission for approval. The unanswered point was whether Upsi disagreed with the religious approach used by the poster advocates or whether it opposed the poster being circulated online because it did not have university authorisation. The discrepancy mattered because the poster reportedly listed “benefits” for students who registered as converts to Islam.
Why the “not approved” question became more contentious
The controversy drew attention from Senator Dr RA Lingeshwaran, who called for a thorough investigation into the matter. Concern was also raised about the use of financial aid or “benefits” to encourage conversion, with the multi-faith Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism expressing concern about inducement through financial assistance. That context heightened the need for a clear explanation of what Upsi meant by the poster not being approved.
What would be needed to fully interpret Upsi’s position
To understand what “not approved” meant in full, the missing element is Upsi’s specific reason for disassociation in relation to both process and content. The available information indicates the poster was not submitted for management approval, but it does not provide the university’s detailed stance on the religious framing or on whether the “benefits” element was the trigger for disassociation. Without that clarification, the exact meaning of “not approved” remains limited to the fact of non-submission to management.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What exactly did Upsi mean by the June 15 poster not being approved?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends