What excuses do Singaporean motorists use for unpaid summonses?

Question

Accepted Answer

Singaporean Motorists' Excuses for Unpaid Summonses

Singaporean motorists caught with unpaid traffic summonses have cited several common excuses, including claiming the summonses were not theirs, stating the vehicle was rented, or professing ignorance of the offence. These justifications are often presented when drivers are apprehended for various traffic violations, particularly speeding and reckless driving, which are frequently observed when Singaporeans drive in Johor Bahru.
Claims of Non-Ownership or Rental

A prevalent excuse offered by Singaporean drivers is that the summonses in question do not belong to them. This is frequently coupled with the assertion that the vehicle involved in the offence was rented. Such claims suggest an attempt to distance themselves from the responsibility of the traffic violation by attributing it to a third party or a temporary vehicle status.
Assertions of Ignorance

Another frequently used excuse is a declaration of not being aware of the summons or the underlying traffic offence. This "I don't know about it" defence is considered a "ridiculous excuse" by authorities. It implies a lack of due diligence on the part of the driver to check for outstanding notices or to be mindful of their driving behaviour.
Adoption of the 'Tidak Apa' Attitude

Authorities suggest that some Singaporean motorists have adopted a "tidak apa" (don't care) attitude, similar to what is perceived among some Malaysians. This mentality, where individuals may not bother with unpaid summonses, is seen as a contributing factor to the non-payment. The belief appears to be that they can evade consequences, a notion that authorities are working to counter.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What excuses do Singaporean motorists use for unpaid summonses?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends