What factors contribute to the vast difference in migrant death figures?

Question

Accepted Answer

Disparities in Migrant Death Tolls Stem from Differing Methodologies and Information Dissemination

The significant discrepancy between Morocco's reported death toll of 11 and Spain's figure of at least 72 individuals who died attempting to reach Ceuta appears to stem from differing methods of counting fatalities and the influence of misinformation. Morocco's interior ministry attributed the surge in crossings and subsequent deaths partly to the "malicious exploitation" of social media and the "spread of misleading information," which may have encouraged a larger, more desperate influx of migrants. Additionally, the ministry pointed to "misinterpretations of legal provisions," specifically referencing a Spanish Supreme Court ruling on July 8 concerning the return of sea migrants, suggesting confusion or misapplication of these regulations may have played a role.
Varying Definitions of Fatalities and Victim Counts

The differing figures likely arise from distinct criteria used by Moroccan and Spanish authorities to define and count casualties. Morocco's official toll of 11 deaths, with 10 confirmed drownings and one fatality from a fall, represents a direct count of confirmed deceased individuals. In contrast, Spain's significantly higher figure of at least 72 deaths suggests a broader methodology that may encompass individuals confirmed deceased, those presumed lost at sea, or potentially even those reported missing by relatives. The Moroccan Association for Human Rights (AMDH) further complicates this by reporting "nearly 130 victims" and dozens more missing, indicating a wider scope of assessment that includes individuals whose fate remains unconfirmed.
The Influence of Social Media and Misinformation

Morocco's interior ministry explicitly cited the "malicious exploitation" of social media and the "spread of misleading information" as contributing factors to the large number of attempted crossings. This suggests that false or exaggerated claims about opportunities or lax border controls may have incentivized a greater number of individuals to undertake the perilous journey. The sheer volume of attempts, estimated by Morocco at 40,000 into Ceuta alone, supports the idea that a significant push, possibly fueled by misinformation, drove this surge, leading to more potential incidents and, consequently, a higher death toll as recorded by Spanish authorities.
Legal Interpretations and Migration Policies

The Moroccan interior ministry also pointed to "misinterpretations of legal provisions" as a factor, specifically mentioning a July 8 Spanish Supreme Court ruling. This ruling reportedly stipulated that migrants arriving by sea should not be returned as quickly as others. A misinterpretation or perceived loophole in this legal guidance could have been exploited or misunderstood by potential migrants or those facilitating their journeys, potentially leading to a belief that crossing would offer a greater chance of remaining in Spanish territory, thereby contributing to the increased number of attempts and the associated risks.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What factors contribute to the vast difference in migrant death figures?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends