What factors did the 2006 Cabinet consider before cancelling it?

Question

Accepted Answer

The 2006 Cabinet Considered Moral, Financial, and International Law Implications Before Cancelling the Crooked Bridge Project

In April 2006, the Malaysian government, under the fifth prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, decided to discontinue the "crooked bridge" project. This decision was made by the Cabinet after considering various factors that had implications on moral, financial, and international law. The discontinuation resulted in the government compensating affected parties a total of RM257.4 million.
Financial Compensation Paid Upon Cancellation

Following the Cabinet's decision to halt the bridge project, which included a rail bridge valued at RM1.113 billion, the government incurred significant compensation costs. The total amount disbursed to parties involved in the project reached RM257.4 million. This figure encompasses payments made to the main contractor, subcontractors, and additional special compensation.
Breakdown of Compensation Disbursements

The primary recipient of the compensation was the main contractor, Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd, which received RM155 million. Subcontractors involved in the project were collectively paid RM67.4 million. An additional RM35 million was allocated as special compensation to other affected parties.
Cabinet's Consideration of Multiple Factors

The decision by the Cabinet in April 2006 to cancel the bridge project was not taken lightly. It was explicitly stated that the decision took into account multiple factors with implications on moral, financial, and international law. These considerations formed the basis for discontinuing the project package at that time.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What factors did the 2006 Cabinet consider before cancelling it?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends