What grounds does Shahrir Samad cite to strike out the defamation suit?

Question

Accepted Answer

Shahrir Abdul Samad Cites Procedural Irregularities and Lack of Basis for Compensation in Bid to Strike Out Defamation Suit

Former Felda chairman Tan Sri Shahrir Abdul Samad has cited procedural irregularities and a lack of basis for the RM100 million compensation sought by Synergy Promenade Sdn Bhd as grounds for his application to strike out the defamation suit filed against him. The High Court has scheduled October 31 to hear this application, alongside the plaintiff's own application to strike out Shahrir's defence.
Plaintiff's Failure to Follow Procedure

Shahrir's legal team, represented by Farah Shuhadah Razali, contends that Synergy Promenade Sdn Bhd did not adhere to the required legal procedures in filing its defamation suit. This alleged procedural deficiency forms a key basis for the application to dismiss the case.
Absence of Basis for RM100 Million Compensation Claim

Furthermore, the application highlights that the plaintiff, Synergy Promenade Sdn Bhd, allegedly lacks any substantive grounds to claim RM100 million in compensation from Shahrir Abdul Samad. This assertion questions the validity and justification of the substantial financial damages sought by the property developer.
Court to Hear Applications on October 31

The High Court deputy registrar, Catherine Nicholas, set October 31 as the date for these hearings. On the same day, Judge Darryl Goon Siew Chye will hear both Shahrir's application to strike out the suit and Synergy Promenade's application to strike out the defence filed by Shahrir.
Defamation Suit Filed Over Felda Land Issue Statements

Synergy Promenade Sdn Bhd initiated the defamation suit on June 4, alleging that Shahrir made several defamatory statements between December 2017 and March 2018, which were published by various media outlets and online platforms. The company claims these statements damaged its reputation and led to the loss of ongoing projects, prompting its pursuit of an injunction and RM100 million in compensation.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What grounds does Shahrir Samad cite to strike out the defamation suit?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends