What is the purpose of appointing politicians to GLCs?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Purpose of Appointing Politicians to Government-Linked Companies (GLCs)

Politicians are appointed to government-linked companies (GLCs) primarily to ensure the implementation of the ruling coalition's policies and aspirations. This practice, while drawing criticism, is framed by proponents as a mechanism to align corporate direction with governmental objectives, particularly in driving economic development and socio-economic progress.
Ensuring Policy and Aspiration Implementation

Umno president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi articulated that political appointments to GLCs serve the crucial function of executing the Perikatan Nasional (PN) government's policies and "aspirations." This viewpoint suggests that individuals with political affiliations are best positioned to translate the ruling party's agenda into actionable strategies within these state-linked entities. Congratulating MPs from Umno, MCA, MIC, and PAS who received such appointments, Zahid emphasised this alignment as a key objective.
Maintaining a Tradition of Strategic Economic Involvement

The tradition of appointing politicians to GLCs and government-linked investment companies (GLICs) is seen by some as a continuation of past practices aimed at economic stimulation. The previous Barisan Nasional government, for instance, utilised GLCs and GLICs extensively in strategic projects and businesses to foster economic growth and advance the socio-economic well-being of the populace. This historical precedent provides a context for understanding the rationale behind current appointments, positing them as tools for national development.
Distinction Between Board and Senior Management Roles

While political appointees may fill board positions to implement ruling party policies, it is argued that senior management roles, such as Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) and Managing Directors, continue to be filled based on merit. According to this perspective, these critical operational leadership positions are still awarded based on professional qualifications, experience, and suitability for the specific field of work, thereby maintaining a degree of professional governance.
Criticisms and Alternative Perspectives on Appointments

The practice of appointing politicians to GLCs has faced significant criticism, with some viewing it as a form of "political reward" to maintain coalition stability rather than a merit-based selection. Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Khaled Nordin, for example, had previously cautioned against using such appointments solely to keep a coalition intact, suggesting that good governance and accountability are more crucial for gaining public support. Additionally, calls have been made by other political factions, such as Pakatan Harapan, for the government to cease political appointments and instead focus on pressing national issues like the COVID-19 outbreak.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the purpose of appointing politicians to GLCs?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends