What is the real impact of the Emergency on government accountability?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Emergency Has Significantly Impeded Government Accountability Mechanisms

The declaration of the Emergency has led to the suspension of key parliamentary oversight bodies, namely the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and other Parliamentary Select Committees (PSCs). This suspension, directed by the Dewan Rakyat Speaker, halts all proceedings and meetings of these committees, thereby preventing them from fulfilling their crucial role in monitoring government administration and finances. PAC chairman Wong Kah Woh has strongly refuted claims that the government system, including the PAC, is functioning as usual, arguing that such statements are either misinformed or deliberately misleading regarding the impact of the Emergency.
Suspension of Parliamentary Committees Halts Oversight Functions

Following the instructions from the Dewan Rakyat Speaker, both the PAC and other PSCs have ceased all operations during the Emergency. PAC chairman Wong Kah Woh clarified that this directive means PAC meetings must be stopped, directly contradicting de facto Law Minister Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan's assertion that the government system, including the PAC, continues to function normally. This suspension effectively cripples the committees' ability to scrutinise government expenditure and administrative actions, particularly those undertaken during the ongoing Emergency period.
Calls for Resumption of Proceedings Have Been Ignored

Despite public calls for the reconvening of PAC and PSC meetings, these appeals have not been heeded. Dr Kelvin Yii, the Bandar Kuching MP and chairman of the PSC for Health, Science and Innovation, had publicly requested the resumption of these committee meetings on March 18. However, this request was apparently overlooked by both the government and the Dewan Rakyat Speaker, indicating a lack of urgency in restoring parliamentary oversight during this period.
Parliament's Sitting is Necessary for PAC Reporting

The ability of the PAC to table its reports in Parliament is contingent upon Parliament itself being allowed to sit. Wong Kah Woh has stressed that the government must permit Parliament to convene so that the PAC can present its findings, which are vital for public interest and national governance. While Takiyuddin Hassan indicated that Parliament would reconvene after the Emergency ends in August, or potentially sooner, the continued suspension of sittings prevents the tabling of critical oversight reports.
Alternative Channels Offer Limited Oversight

In response to concerns about accountability, de facto Law Minister Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan suggested that parliamentarians can submit queries, views, or complaints through channels such as the Special Independent Emergency Committee 2021 (SIEC). He also stated that law enforcement authorities, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, and the National Audit Department continue to monitor the administration, implying that the government system is functioning as usual. However, these alternative channels and existing bodies do not fully replicate the specific mandate and public scrutiny provided by active PAC and PSC proceedings and the subsequent tabling of their reports in Parliament.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the real impact of the Emergency on government accountability?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends