What is the significance of the RM68,000 sale value in the case?

Question

Accepted Answer

Significance of the RM68,000 Sale Value in the Perhilitan Deception Case

The RM68,000 sale value is significant as it represents the undisclosed financial transaction that a company director allegedly concealed from the Pahang Department of Wildlife and National Parks (Perhilitan). This concealment was central to the charge of deception, as the director, Datuk Chan Kong San, is accused of presenting the RM68,000 transfer of two white lions and a Eurasian lynx to Melaka Zoo as a mere handover, rather than a sale. The prosecution argues that the Pahang Perhilitan director would not have approved the application if he had been aware of the monetary aspect of the transaction.
Undisclosed Financial Transaction

The core of the legal proceedings revolves around the RM68,000 figure, which was the agreed-upon price for the animals. Datuk Chan Kong San, representing Sentoria Themeparks and Resorts Sdn Bhd, allegedly omitted this crucial detail when seeking approval for the transfer of protected wildlife. By presenting the transaction as a handover, the intent was to bypass scrutiny that would likely have been applied to a commercial sale of protected species under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010.
Basis for Deception Charge

The alleged deception hinges on the misrepresentation of the RM68,000 transaction. Under Section 415(b) of the Penal Code, the charge of cheating by personation or by any deceitful means is invoked when a person intentionally deceives another to facilitate the commission of a fraudulent act. In this instance, the alleged deceit was the concealment of the sale value, which in turn led the Perhilitan director to take a specific action—approving the transfer—that he would not have otherwise taken.
Impact on Regulatory Approval

The RM68,000 sale was concealed to influence the decision-making process of the Pahang Perhilitan director. Had the director been informed that the transfer of the white lions and Eurasian lynx was a sale valued at RM68,000, it is stated he would not have approved the application. This highlights the procedural and regulatory implications of such transactions, suggesting that sales of protected wildlife may be subject to different, potentially more stringent, approval processes than simple handovers or transfers.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the significance of the RM68,000 sale value in the case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends