What is the core dispute over the 2001 acquisition of Renong and UEM shares?

Question

Accepted Answer

Core Dispute Over 2001 Acquisition of Renong and UEM Shares

Businessman Tan Sri Halim Saad is appealing a High Court decision that dismissed his lawsuit concerning alleged losses from the government's 2001 acquisition of shares in Renong Bhd and United Engineers Malaysia Berhad (UEM). The dispute centres on Halim Saad's claim that he was coerced into relinquishing his positions and selling his Renong shares at a loss, while the defendants maintain the takeover was approved and compensation was paid.
Allegations of Forced Takeover and Loss

Halim Saad's legal action asserts that he was instructed by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and former Finance Minister Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop not to proceed with privatising UEM, as the government intended to acquire the shares through Khazanah Nasional Berhad. He claims he was subsequently directed to resign from his roles and sell his Renong shares at a significant loss, with Khazanah ultimately securing UEM shares via its subsidiary Danasaham Sdn Bhd. Halim Saad is seeking compensation for this alleged forced takeover, which he states occurred between July and October 2001, and a declaration confirming his status as a Renong shareholder.
Defendants' Stance on Approved Takeover and Compensation

The government, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, and Nor Mohamed Yakcop deny that the shareholding in Renong and UEM was forcibly taken over. Their defence contends that Halim Saad approved the transaction and received RM165 million in compensation. This position suggests that the acquisition was a consensual business transaction rather than a coercive action.
High Court's Dismissal Based on Time Bar and Prior Decision

The High Court previously dismissed Halim Saad's lawsuit, ruling that it was time-barred and that the core issues had already been adjudicated in a prior legal proceeding. This decision implies that the court found Halim Saad had waited too long to bring his claim and that the matter had been settled or decided previously.
History of Similar Legal Challenges

This current appeal follows a similar lawsuit Halim Saad filed in April 2013 against Khazanah Nasional, Nor Mohamed, and the government, seeking over RM1.8 billion in damages. That suit was also struck out by the High Court in October 2013 on the grounds of being filed outside the six-year statutory time limit. Subsequent appeals by Halim Saad in the Court of Appeal in 2014 and an application for leave to appeal at the Federal Court in 2015 were also unsuccessful, reinforcing the judicial stance on the timeliness of his claims.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the core dispute over the 2001 acquisition of Renong and UEM shares?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends