What is the real-world impact of e-petitions on Malaysian policy changes?

Question

Accepted Answer

E-petitions in Malaysia have not yet been proven to directly cause specific policy changes, though they have helped generate public debate and have been linked to some contested outcomes
Malaysian e-petitions have surged after the government changed, with citizens using platforms such as Change.org to create petitions in about five minutes and gather signatures quickly. The real-world impact on policy changes is still debated: some cases appear to have “worked,” but it is not always clear whether the petitions caused the outcomes or whether the results were merely correlated with other developments.
Petitions are easy to create and have increased after the government change
In Malaysia, the number of petitions in cyberspace rose in the two months after the historic change in government, alongside increased public engagement on social media and at rallies or forums. E-petitions can be set up rapidly on sites like Change.org, with the process described as involving creating an account, stating a position, adding a picture, and sharing a link.
The government has created a formal channel for recommendations through institutional reforms
The reform agenda has been reflected in the establishment of the Committee on Institutional Reforms, led by legal experts. This committee is described as allowing ordinary Malaysians to submit recommendations about institutions or institutional practices that could be barriers to a better nation, which gives petitioning a potential pathway into formal discussion even when the petition itself is online.
Overseas evidence shows signatures do not automatically translate into successful policy outcomes
The article points to the United Kingdom as a comparison: petitions there can be debated in Parliament only if they reach more than 100,000 signatures, cited as about 0.0015 per cent of the population. It also notes that the top 10 most shared UK campaigns were unsuccessful upon debate, and that petitions have been criticised as “slacktivism” because they can involve support through clicking rather than deeper influence efforts.
Malaysia examples exist, but direct causation is uncertain and future impact is unclear
Back home, petitions such as “Tommy Thomas for AG” and “Dr Mazlee for Education Minister” are described as seeming to have worked, while the “Calls for an Environment Ministry” and “Dr Mahathir for the Nobel Peace Prize” are cited as examples of what people have been posting. At the same time, the article explicitly raises debate over whether outcomes were caused by the petitions or were only correlated, and it concludes that the impact of petitions on future domestic policy remains to be seen.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the real-world impact of e-petitions on Malaysian policy changes?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends