What is the alleged implication of changing the Dewan Rakyat Secretary?

Question

Accepted Answer

Allegations of Executive Interference Following Dewan Rakyat Secretary Change

The recent change in the Secretary of the Dewan Rakyat, announced just five days before Parliament was set to convene for the Royal Address, has drawn significant criticism. Opposition parties have voiced concerns that this move signals potential interference by the executive branch in the legislative arm of government, a notion that runs counter to the principle of separation of powers. This development has added to the broader unease surrounding the shortened parliamentary session.
Concerns Over Separation of Powers

The appointment of a new Secretary to the Dewan Rakyat, effective May 13, has been met with strong objections. PKR Senator Yusmadi Yusoff specifically articulated concerns that such a change, occurring so close to a parliamentary sitting, could be interpreted as executive overreach into the affairs of the legislature. This perspective highlights a fundamental tenet of democratic governance, where distinct branches of government are expected to operate independently.
Opposition Shock and Disappointment

The announcement of the personnel change in the Dewan Rakyat secretariat elicited shock from Opposition parties, including Pakatan Harapan, Bersatu, and Warisan. These parties issued a joint statement expressing their dismay, viewing the directive to proceed with the King's address under these circumstances as "regrettable and disappointing." Their statement underscored the belief that Parliament should serve as a platform for public discourse and a cornerstone of democracy, suggesting that the current actions indicated a reluctance on the part of the government to engage with dissenting voices.
Perceived Influence on Parliamentary Institutions

Beyond the immediate concerns about the Secretary's position, the broader context of the parliamentary session has fueled suspicions. Opposition leaders stated that the change contributes to a perception that certain entities may be exerting undue influence over parliamentary institutions. This sentiment is intertwined with their objection to the shortened duration of the parliamentary meeting, which they argue limits the ability to scrutinise the government's response to the Covid-19 crisis and effectively suppresses the mandate of the people.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the alleged implication of changing the Dewan Rakyat Secretary?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends