What is the role of Section 19B in preventing statelessness for abandoned children?

Question

Accepted Answer

Section 19B of the Federal Constitution Presumes Permanent Residency for Found Newborns, Aiding in Citizenship for Abandoned Children

Section 19B of Part III of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution plays a crucial role in preventing statelessness for abandoned children by establishing a presumption of permanent residency for their mothers. This provision dictates that any newborn child found exposed in a particular location is presumed to have been born to a mother permanently residing there, unless evidence to the contrary is presented. The date on which the child is found is considered the child's date of birth. This legal framework was interpreted by the Federal Court to encompass children abandoned at their place of birth, where the identity of their biological parents remains unknown, thereby facilitating their path to citizenship and avoiding statelessness.
Broad Interpretation of "Found Exposed" Aids Abandoned Children

The Federal Court has interpreted the phrase "found exposed" in Section 19B to include a child abandoned at the location of birth by a mother whose identity is not known. This broad interpretation is essential to ensure that the constitutional objective of preventing statelessness is not rendered ineffective. For instance, in the case of a child identified as C, who was abandoned at Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Section 19B meant he was presumed to have been born to a mother permanently residing at that hospital. This presumption, when read in conjunction with Section 1(a) of Part II of the Second Schedule, which outlines citizenship by operation of law for those born in Malaysia with at least one parent being a citizen or permanent resident, fulfilled the requirements for C to be recognised as a Malaysian citizen.
Burden of Proof Rests with the Registrar-General

The Federal Court has clarified that the onus is on the Registrar-General of Births and Deaths to conduct investigations into the birth of abandoned children. If the biological parents cannot be identified through these investigations, the Registrar-General is obligated to recognise the child's citizenship under Section 1(a) read with Section 19B. The court underscored that the Registrar-General possesses no discretion to deny citizenship or render a child stateless if the presumption established by Section 19B is not successfully rebutted with contrary evidence. This places a clear responsibility on the authorities to actively ascertain a child's status rather than leaving them in a state of statelessness due to a lack of identifiable parents.
Preventing Statelessness as an Overarching Purpose

The purpose of Section 19B is to address the harsh realities faced by newborn children who are abandoned in various locations, such as hospitals, public restrooms, or other public areas. The Federal Court acknowledged that a literal interpretation of "exposed" might not cover all such scenarios, but stressed that the provision's overarching objective is to prevent statelessness. Consequently, the broadest possible interpretation of "found exposed" is necessary to include children abandoned by unknown mothers at their place of birth. To fail to do so would defeat the constitutional aim of preventing statelessness, making that purpose illusory for vulnerable children.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the role of Section 19B in preventing statelessness for abandoned children?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends