What is the specific legal rule regarding judgment pronouncements in the Federal Court?

Question

Accepted Answer

Rule 63 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995 permits judgments to be delivered even if a judge who was part of the panel is absent.

The Federal Court has the legal provision to pronounce a judgment even in the absence of one or more judges who constituted the bench. Rule 63 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995 explicitly states that such a judgment can be delivered notwithstanding the absence of the judges.
Judgments May Be Pronounced in Absentia

According to Rule 63(2) of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995, a judgment can be pronounced even if some or all of the judges who formed the court are not present. This provision allows for the continuation of judicial proceedings and the delivery of decisions under specific circumstances.
Alternative Reading of Judgments

The same rule further specifies that if a judge who was part of the panel is absent, their judgment can be read aloud by another judge of the Federal Court or by the Registrar. This ensures that the collective decision or individual opinions can still be formally presented to the parties involved.
Discretionary Power for Adjournments

While Rule 63 provides a mechanism for delivering judgments in absentia, the decision to adjourn or postpone a pronouncement rests entirely within the absolute discretion of the court. This principle was affirmed in the Federal Court's decision in Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Hj Abdul Razak v Public Prosecutor, highlighting the court's ultimate authority on such matters.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the specific legal rule regarding judgment pronouncements in the Federal Court?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends