What is the specific charge Pritam Singh faces from the Law Society?

Question

Accepted Answer

Disciplinary Proceedings Against Pritam Singh Set for August 13 Hearing

The Law Society of Singapore has initiated disciplinary proceedings against Pritam Singh, a matter that will be heard on August 13 before the Court of Three Judges. These proceedings stem from his conviction for lying under oath to the Committee of Privileges, an offence confirmed by the Attorney-General's Chambers to involve fraud or dishonesty.

The specific charge Pritam Singh faces from the Law Society, while not explicitly detailed in the provided information, is a consequence of his prior conviction. In February 2025, he was found guilty of making false statements under oath to the Committee of Privileges, a case that originated from former Workers' Party MP Raeesah Khan's misrepresentation in Parliament in 2021 concerning a sexual assault case. After losing his appeal in December 2025 and paying a S$14,000 fine, Parliament subsequently passed a motion declaring him unfit to continue as Leader of the Opposition, a position from which he was formally removed by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong on January 15.
Legal Profession Act Mandates Disciplinary Action

The Law Society is obligated by the Legal Profession Act to commence disciplinary action when the Attorney-General's Chambers certifies that an individual has been convicted of offences involving fraud or dishonesty. This legal framework ensures that legal practitioners maintain high standards of integrity and honesty. The Court of Three Judges, which will preside over the hearing, is the ultimate disciplinary body for lawyers in Singapore, empowered to impose sanctions ranging from striking a lawyer off the roll to imposing significant fines or censures.
Potential Sanctions for Legal Practitioners

Should the Court of Three Judges find against Pritam Singh, the potential sanctions are severe. These could include being struck off the roll of practising lawyers, effectively ending his legal career, or facing a financial penalty of up to S$100,000. A censure, which is a formal reprimand, is also a possible outcome. The proceedings are being conducted with Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull representing the Law Society and Peter Cuthbert Low representing Singh.
Background of the Conviction

The conviction that triggered these disciplinary proceedings relates to statements made by Pritam Singh to the Committee of Privileges. This committee was established to investigate a false statement made by Raeesah Khan in Parliament in 2021. Singh's conviction for lying under oath during this investigation led to significant repercussions, including the parliamentary motion to remove him from his leadership role.
Outcome of Parliamentary and Party Actions

Following his conviction and the parliamentary motion, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong formally removed Pritam Singh from his position as Leader of the Opposition on January 15. Separately, the Workers' Party itself convened a disciplinary panel, issuing Singh a formal reprimand for breaching party constitutional articles. Despite internal dissent, Singh was subsequently re-elected as the party's secretary-general on June 28 with a substantial majority.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the specific charge Pritam Singh faces from the Law Society?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends