What is the Malaysian Bar seeking through its judicial review beyond quashing the appointment?

Question

Accepted Answer

The Malaysian Bar Seeks Mandamus Orders and Declarations Beyond Quashing an Appointment

The Malaysian Bar is pursuing a judicial review that extends beyond merely quashing the appointment of Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh to the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). The Bar is specifically seeking mandamus orders to compel the Prime Minister to fulfil his legal obligations regarding JAC appointments and to establish a royal commission of inquiry into allegations against Ahmad Terrirudin, with the aim of making its findings public.
Mandamus Order to Compel Prime Ministerial Prerogative in JAC Appointments

In addition to challenging Ahmad Terrirudin's presence on the JAC, the Malaysian Bar is seeking a mandamus order directed at the Prime Minister. This order would compel the Prime Minister to exercise his prerogative powers in appointing members to the JAC strictly in accordance with Malaysian law, established conventions, and the specific provisions of the JAC Act. This reflects a broader concern about the proper functioning and composition of the commission.
Mandamus Order for a Royal Commission of Inquiry

The Bar's application also includes a request for a mandamus order to establish a royal commission of inquiry. The stated purpose of this commission would be to thoroughly investigate allegations that have been made against Ahmad Terrirudin. Crucially, the Bar specifies that the findings of this inquiry should be made public, indicating a desire for transparency and accountability regarding the issues raised.
Declaration of Unlawful Appointment and Stay Pending Judicial Review

Furthermore, the Malaysian Bar is asking the High Court to formally declare Ahmad Terrirudin's appointment to the JAC as unlawful, null, and void. This legal challenge aims to invalidate the appointment itself. The Bar is also seeking an interim measure, requesting a stay of the appointment, which would temporarily suspend its effect pending the final determination of the judicial review proceedings.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the Malaysian Bar seeking through its judicial review beyond quashing the appointment?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

2

0

0

Share with friends