What is the core difference between bail under Section 387 and Section 388 of the CPC?

Question

Accepted Answer

The core difference between bail under Section 387 and Section 388 of the Criminal Procedure Code lies in the court's discretion and the ability to impose conditions.

Bail granted under Section 387 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) pertains to bailable offences, where an accused person has an absolute right to be released upon providing bail, and the court has no discretion to refuse it or impose conditions. In contrast, Section 388 of the CPC governs non-bailable offences, granting the court discretionary power to either grant or refuse bail, which inherently includes the authority to impose specific conditions as part of the bail bond.
Bail for Bailable Offences Under Section 387

For bailable offences, Section 387 of the CPC establishes a clear entitlement to bail. Once an accused individual is prepared to furnish the required bail, the court is legally obligated to grant release. This section explicitly removes any discretion from the court to deny bail in such circumstances, and consequently, there is no power to attach any conditions to the bail order.
Bail for Non-Bailable Offences Under Section 388

Section 388 of the CPC addresses non-bailable offences, where the court exercises discretion in granting bail. This discretion allows the court to consider various factors before deciding whether to release an accused person. Crucially, this discretionary power to grant or refuse bail implies a further discretion to set conditions that must be met for the bail to be effective, such as surrendering a passport or reporting to the police.
Imposition of Conditions on Bail

The distinction in judicial discretion directly impacts the imposition of conditions. In cases of bailable offences under Section 387, where the right to bail is paramount and the court has no authority to refuse it, the imposition of conditions is not permissible. However, for non-bailable offences governed by Section 388, the court's discretionary power extends to stipulating conditions within the bail bond, ensuring compliance and addressing potential flight risks or interference with investigations.
Legal Precedent on Bail Conditions

The legal interpretation, as highlighted in cases such as Rex v Genda Singh & Ors [1950], supports the principle that conditions can only be attached when the court possesses the discretion to refuse bail. Where an offence is bailable, and thus the court has no discretion to withhold bail, the question of imposing conditions does not arise. This understanding ensures that the right to bail in bailable offences remains unfettered by stipulations that could hinder release.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What is the core difference between bail under Section 387 and Section 388 of the CPC?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends