What led to the RM3.1 million damages awarded in the botched circumcision case?

Question

Accepted Answer

RM3.1 Million Damages Awarded Due to Negligence in Botched Circumcision

A 22-year-old man has been awarded RM3.1 million in damages by the High Court following a botched circumcision procedure performed 12 years ago. The court found the government and four medical professionals negligent in their care, which resulted in the plaintiff suffering the loss of the head of his penis. The lawsuit, filed on July 19, 2018, detailed the incident that occurred on December 13, 2010.
Ruling on Negligence by Medical Professionals and Government

The High Court, presided over by Judge Datuk Akhtar Tahir, ruled that all five defendants were negligent in the circumstances surrounding the plaintiff's procedure. The defendants included medical officers and directors from Kuala Lipis Hospital, as well as specialists and directors from Selayang Hospital. The court's decision was made after a trial that commenced on September 22, 2020, involving eight witnesses, including five from the defence.
Breakdown of Damages Awarded

The total sum of RM3.1 million awarded to the plaintiff comprises several components. Special damages, covering specific financial losses, amounted to RM108,356. General damages, intended to compensate for non-economic losses, were set at RM2 million. Additionally, aggravated damages of RM500,000 were awarded, acknowledging the mental distress and humiliation suffered by the plaintiff. Exemplary damages, designed to punish egregious conduct and deter future wrongdoing, totalled RM500,000. The court also awarded RM100,000 for costs.
Plaintiff's Permanent Disability and Psychological Impact

As a direct consequence of the botched circumcision, the plaintiff sustained a permanent disability. The incident led to the complete severance of the head of his penis. This severe injury has had a profound psychological impact, with the plaintiff reportedly becoming a "quiet person" as a result of the trauma and its lasting effects. The lawsuit highlighted the permanent nature of his disability and the significant changes in his personality and well-being.
Legal Proceedings and Appeals

The legal journey for this case was lengthy, involving an initial attempt to strike out the negligence suit by the defendants on February 20, 2019. However, the plaintiff appealed this decision, and on February 20, 2020, the Court of Appeal ordered the case to be returned to the High Court for a full trial. The final ruling on the substantial damages was delivered through an online proceeding via Zoom.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What led to the RM3.1 million damages awarded in the botched circumcision case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends