What led to the acquittal of Datuk Noor Ehsanuddin in bribery case?

Question

Accepted Answer

Datuk Noor Ehsanuddin's Acquittal in Bribery Case Stemmed from Prosecution's Withdrawal of Charges

Datuk Noor Ehsanuddin Mohd Harun Narrashi was discharged and acquitted of 29 bribery charges after the prosecution decided to withdraw all charges against him. This decision was conveyed to the Sessions Court on May 21, leading to his acquittal. Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) has called for an explanation from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) regarding the rationale behind this withdrawal, particularly after the defence statement was considered, to maintain public trust.
Prosecution Withdrew All Charges

The acquittal of Datuk Noor Ehsanuddin was a direct result of the prosecution informing the court of its decision to withdraw all 29 bribery charges. This action was presented during proceedings before Sessions Court judge Suzana Hussin. His lawyer, Datuk Hasnal Rezua Merican, confirmed that the prosecution communicated this decision, which then led to the court's order for discharge and acquittal.
Nature of Bribery Allegations

The charges against Noor Ehsanuddin were related to alleged bribery activities during his tenure as a Felda board member. These allegations included 14 counts of accepting bribe instalments totalling RM23,540.68 for a BMW 3 Series car from Karya Hidayah Sdn Bhd between 2014 and 2015. He also faced 10 charges for receiving RM50,000 and a piece of land from the same company between 2013 and 2014.
Additional Counts of Bribery

Further allegations against Noor Ehsanuddin comprised five counts involving the acceptance of vehicle maintenance for two vehicles. Additionally, he was charged with accepting payment for legal fees amounting to RM12,707.60 related to the purchase of a piece of land. These various counts collectively formed the basis of the 29 charges he faced prior to the prosecution's decision to withdraw them.
Call for MACC Explanation

Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) has expressed a need for the MACC to provide a public explanation for the withdrawal of charges. TI-M president Mohammad Mohan stated that the MACC owes the public clarity on why the charges were dropped after the defence statement was reviewed. This is considered important to address public queries and to prevent a deficit in trust towards the MACC.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What led to the acquittal of Datuk Noor Ehsanuddin in bribery case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends