What legal avenue did Jamal Yunos attempt to use to delay the auction?

Question

Accepted Answer

Jamal Yunos Attempted Interpleader Claims to Delay Auction

Jamal Yunos sought to postpone the auction of 14 seized movable properties by having his son, Muhammad Amin Daniel, file an interpleader claim asserting ownership of the items. This legal manoeuvre was ultimately unsuccessful, as the High Court dismissed the claim, paving the way for the auction to proceed.
Dismissal of Son's Interpleader Claim

Muhammad Amin Daniel's attempt to claim ownership of the seized assets was dismissed by the High Court. This decision included an order for costs amounting to RM8,000 to be paid. The court's ruling effectively removed this specific legal obstacle to the execution of the judgment.
Withdrawal of Another Interpleader Claim

In addition to his son's unsuccessful claim, another individual, Mohd Razali Kamin, had also filed an interpleader claim. However, this claim was subsequently withdrawn. The court ordered Mohd Razali Kamin to pay RM2,000 in costs related to his withdrawal.
Outstanding Judgment and Auction Date

These legal attempts to delay the auction occurred after Jamal Yunos failed to settle an outstanding judgment of RM66,061.85 owed to Seputeh Member of Parliament Teresa Kok, stemming from a defamation suit. With the interpleader claims dismissed, the auction of the 14 movable properties seized from Jamal's residence is scheduled for June 22, 2026.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What legal avenue did Jamal Yunos attempt to use to delay the auction?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends