What legal errors did the prosecution identify in the acquittal?

Question

Accepted Answer

Prosecution Alleges Judicial Errors in Acquittal of Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette

The prosecution contends that the High Court judge committed several legal and factual errors when acquitting Datuk Seri Bung Moktar Radin and Datin Seri Zizie Izette Abdul Samad of corruption charges related to a RM2.8 million Felcra Bhd investment. These alleged errors form the basis of the prosecution's appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Judge Erred in Review Process Without Full Consideration of Sessions Court Records

The prosecution argues that High Court Judge Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid erred by proceeding with a legal review and acquitting the couple without adequately examining the grounds of judgment and proceedings from the Sessions Court. Specifically, it is stated that the judge failed to consider the testimonies of witnesses Madhi Abdul Hamid and Norhaili Ahmad Mokhtar, which were central to the initial Sessions Court ruling.
Failure to Acknowledge Prima Facie Decision is Not Conclusive

A key contention from the prosecution is that the High Court judge overlooked the principle that a prima facie decision is not a final determination of guilt. The argument is that the judge failed to consider that no miscarriage of justice occurred to the respondents, as the initial finding of a prima facie case does not preclude further examination of evidence.
Judge Misinterpreted Basis of Prima Facie Ruling and Admissibility of Evidence

The prosecution further asserts that the judge erred in both law and fact by acquitting the respondents. It is claimed that the Sessions Court's oral ruling did not specify that the prima facie decision rested solely on the testimonies of Madhi and Norhaili. Additionally, the prosecution highlights an alleged error in law where the judge failed to consider the admissibility of partial hostile evidence provided by these same witnesses. Bung Moktar was initially charged with accepting RM2.2 million and RM262,500 as inducement for Felcra approval to invest RM150 million in Public Mutual unit trusts, allegedly from Public Mutual Berhad's investment agent Madhi Abdul Hamid via Zizie Izette. Zizie Izette faced charges of abetting her husband in these transactions.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What legal errors did the prosecution identify in the acquittal?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends