What legal sections are being used in the forgery case?

Question

Accepted Answer

Legal Sections Applied in Peter Anthony's Forgery Case

The Sessions Court has ordered former Sabah Infrastructure Development Minister Datuk Peter Anthony to present his defence on charges related to the alleged falsification of a letter in 2014 concerning a system maintenance contract at Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS). This decision follows the prosecution's success in establishing a prima facie case before Judge Azura Alwi. Peter Anthony, charged in his capacity as the managing director of Syarikat Asli Jati, faces these accusations under specific sections of the Penal Code.
Section 468 of the Penal Code

The primary charge against Peter Anthony is framed under Section 468 of the Penal Code, which deals with the forgery of a document for the purpose of cheating. If found guilty under this section, the penalty includes imprisonment for a term that may extend up to seven years, and potentially a fine. This charge pertains to the alleged falsification of a letter from the office of the UMS Deputy Vice-Chancellor, with the prosecution asserting that a false statement was intentionally inserted to deceive.
Section 471 and 465 of the Penal Code

In addition to the forgery charge, Peter Anthony is also facing an alternative charge. This is brought under Section 471 of the Penal Code, which addresses the offence of using a false document as genuine. The specific document in question is the aforementioned letter from the UMS Deputy Vice-Chancellor's office, dated June 9, 2014, which allegedly contained a false statement in its title. This charge is punishable under Section 465 of the same law, which covers forgery in general, and carries a penalty of imprisonment for up to two years, a fine, or both.
Context of the Alleged Offence

The alleged falsification and use of the false document occurred in 2014. The prosecution contends that the falsification involved inserting a false statement with the intention to cheat, and this act was committed at the office of the Prime Minister’s Principal Private Secretary at the Federal Government Administrative Centre in Putrajaya, between June 13 and August 21, 2014. The court has fixed January 3 to 7 of the following year for the defence hearing.

Reading history

Hide →

This history is cleared when the page is closed.

What legal sections are being used in the forgery case?

Loading

Was this article helpful?

Helpful

Not helpful

Report an issue

1

0

0

Share with friends